The United States provides a wide range of benefits for veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), which was incurred in, or aggravated by, their military service. The United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will provide benefits to veterans that the VA has determined suffer from PTSD, which developed during, or as a result of, their military service. These benefits not only include tax-free cash payments but can also include free or low-cost mental health treatment and other .
U.S. Army Medic The United States provides a wide range of benefits for veterans with (PTSD), which was incurred in, or aggravated by, their military service. The (VA) will provide benefits to veterans that the VA has determined suffer from PTSD, which developed during, or as a result of, their military service.
These benefits not only include tax-free cash payments but can also include free or low-cost mental health treatment and other healthcare; vocational rehabilitation services; employment assistance; independent living support; and more. VA disability benefits for PTSD have evolved over time, in response to , scientific advances, political pressure, revised classification schemes, regulatory changes, , and administrative decisions. Veterans advocacy organizations, researchers, clinicians, politicians, administrators, and citizens will no doubt continue to influence how the United States evaluates, adjudicates, and administers the program.
For example, current efforts at change or reform include urging the VA to place more emphasis on and treatment versus cash payments; revising the to better reflect problems experienced by veterans with PTSD; and considering a veteran's as a factor in determining the . Revolutionary War Soldiers Since the founding of the country, the United States has sought to compensate the men and women who have served in its . In 1917, the passed legislation emphasizing an model for veterans disability benefits.
Congress sought to clarify and better specify provisions of the law in 1919 amendments to the original bill. Since that year, compensation has been provided to veterans suffering from physical or mental disabilities that were incurred during, or aggravated by, military service, and which have adversely impacted the veteran's ability to work. The amount of compensation provided—both cash payments and VA-sponsored services—are based on the veteran's average impairment in earnings capacity.
Since , PTSD has grown to be the third most compensated disability in the VA after and . Effectiveness Whether disability benefits adequately compensate veterans with PTSD for loss in average earning capacity has been debated. Older veterans age 65 and up rated at 50% disabled or higher for PTSD, including individual unemployability (IU) benefits, receive more in compensation (plus any earned income and retirement benefits such as Social Security or pensions) than nondisabled veterans earn in the workforce and/or receive in Social Security and other retirement benefits.
However, younger veterans (age 55 and below) generally receive less in compensation benefits (plus any earned income) than their non-disabled counterparts earn via employment. For example, the parity ratio for a 25-year-old veteran rated 100% disabled by PTSD is 0.75, and for a 35-year-old veteran rated 100% disabled by PTSD the ratio is 0.69.
The parity ratio for a 75-year-old veteran receiving IU benefits is 6.81. Research indicates that veterans receiving disability benefits for PTSD experience a reduction in PTSD symptom severity, and have lower rates of poverty and homelessness.
In addition to lost income, a Congressionally-mandated commission, argued that the VA disability benefits program should compensate veterans for non-economic losses, particularly with regard to a veteran's overall quality of life. The U.S. analyzed this recommendation and suggested that it be considered as one of three major changes to modernize the VA disability benefits program.
Some scholars argue that the VA disability benefits program is "countertherapeutic" because it provides no incentives to overcome symptoms and problems caused by the disorder, and, in fact rewards veterans for staying sick, while other researchers take issue with this assertion. In a similar vein, a military scholar, who lost both legs during combat operations in Iraq, suggests that current VA disability benefits policy inculcates in veterans a lack of and fosters dependency.
To begin the disability claim process, veterans submit a claim to the (VBA), an organizational element of the VA. In order for a veteran to receive disability benefits for PTSD, the VBA, based on their review of medical and psychological evidence, must conclude that the veteran indeed suffers from PTSD.
Reaching such a determination usually requires that the veteran receive a Compensation and Pension examination (), which is a forensic mental health evaluation conducted by a psychologist or psychiatrist at a local VA medical facility or by a psychologist or psychiatrist in independent practice who conducts evaluations for a VA-contracted private vendor.
Benefits claim procedures The VA provides a detailed description of the benefits claims process on its website. Briefly, a VSR (Veterans Service Representative), an employee of the (VBA), reviews the information submitted by a veteran to determine if VBA needs any additional evidence (e.g., medical records) to the claim.
VA has a legal obligation to help veterans obtain any evidence that will support their claim. For example, the VSR might request a veteran's military personnel records, Social Security disability records, or private medical records. The VSR will almost always request a Compensation and Pension examination (C&P exam), also referred to as a VA claim exam. After VBA obtains all relevant documentation (evidence), an RVSR (Ratings Veterans Service Representative) renders a decision regarding the veteran's claim.
To speed up the decision process, it is advised that the claimant secure they own medical information from the facilities that they visited and provide them to the VA. If the VA has to request them it could hold up the process for 90 days. The RVSR refers in part to the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders when making this determination.
Obtaining assistance Veterans may receive assistance with filing a VA disability compensation claim from Veterans Service Officers, also known as "VSO Representatives" or "Veterans Service Representatives". The veteran does not have to pay a Veterans Service Officer for their services.
The VA recommends consulting with a Veterans Service Officer: VA encourages individuals who are applying for disability compensation to work with an accredited representative ...
to assist them ... Being accredited means organizations and individuals must have VA permission to represent Veterans before the Department in their claims for VA benefits. The purpose of this requirement is to ensure that Veterans have qualified and competent representation. These individuals receive specialized training in VA benefits law and procedure.
There are two types of Veterans Service Officers: 1) County Veterans Service Officers - Most states have established a veterans affairs agency to assist veterans, with offices in each county of the state staffed by County Veterans Service Officers. 2) VSO Representatives are volunteers or employees of nonprofit Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs).
In order to represent a veteran before the VA, a Veterans Service Organization must either have been Chartered by the U.S. Congress or have received official approval from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to represent veterans in the disability compensation claims process. From the federal government's perspective, the state veterans affairs agencies are "veterans service organizations" since they too must receive approval to represent veterans.
Members choosing to use a VSO representative can partake in the VA's new Decision Ready Claim process. This ensures a claims decision within 30 days. Some veterans advocates recommend that veterans learn how to file claims on their own so that they retain control over the process.
Post-adjudication representation Veterans may appeal the VBA's decision regarding their compensation claim, and they may ask to be represented by an accredited Veterans Service Officer, attorney, or claims agent in the appeals process. Note that the VA does not require a veteran to be represented on appeal. VA prohibits attorneys or claims agents from charging a veteran for professional services prior to the of the veteran's claim. Seal of the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims Unless they agree to work on a basis, attorneys and claims agents who represent veterans before the Veterans Benefits Administration, , and require payment for their services.
At the federal court level, most attorneys work for fees. These are attorney fees ordered by the court to be paid by the federal government when the government's position in litigation was not "substantially justified." General rating formula for mental disorders If VBA determines that a veteran suffers from service-connected PTSD, then they assign a disability rating, expressed as a percentage.
This disability rating determines the amount of compensation and other disability benefits the VA provides the veteran. The disability rating indicates the extent to which PTSD has deprived the veteran of his or her average earnings capacity. A rating of 0% indicates that a veteran has PTSD but the disorder has not affected his or her ability to work, whereas a 100% rating theoretically means that the veteran is not capable of working at all because of PTSD. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 38 – Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief The VA assigns disability ratings for PTSD according to the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders (38 C.F.R.
§ 4.130), which specifies criteria for disability ratings of 0%, 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, or 100%. Some argue that by relying on the current Rating Formula, "VA uses decades-old regulations developed for mental disorders that do not resemble PTSD", and, consequently, "[i]rrelevant criteria ... may outweigh ... more relevant factors, leading VA to undercompensate veterans with valid diagnoses of PTSD." Similarly, veterans service organizations have argued, for example, that a "... veteran service connected for schizophrenia and another veteran service connected for another psychiatric disorder should not be evaluated using the same general formula" and have supported efforts to revise the Rating Formula.
Concern has been expressed by some RSVRs (VBA 'raters' who claims) that automated software discourages their use of independent judgment to evaluate the claim as a whole, a charge senior VA officials reject.
Since 2001, the VA has been revising its disability rating schedule to incorporate medical advances that have occurred since the last review, update medical terminology, add medical conditions not currently in the Rating Schedule, and refine criteria for further clarity, consistency and ease of rater application.
Requests for an increased disability rating A veteran currently receiving compensation for service-connected PTSD may file a claim for an increase in his or her disability rating (the VA also refers to this as an increased disability evaluation, ), or for individual unemployability: If a veteran believes that PTSD, either alone or in combination with other service-connected disabilities (e.g., diabetes, a back injury, chronic pain, etc.), renders him or her incapable of pursuing and retaining gainful employment, and they meet the eligibility requirements, then they may file a compensation claim based on unemployability.
As noted above, almost always requires a compensation and pension examination (C&P exam), also known as a VA claim exam, for veterans claiming service-connected PTSD. There are two types of PTSD C&P exams: Initial and Review. The Initial Examination for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder must be conducted by a VA psychologist or psychiatrist certified by the Office of Disability and Medical Assessment (DMA) to evaluate veterans for this purpose.
The definition of "VA psychologist or psychiatrist" includes psychologists and psychiatrists in the private sector who conduct C&P exams for a Medical Disability Evaluation (MDE) company under contract with the (VBA) to provide C&P exam services on behalf of the VA.
Although litigation ensued after award of the initial $6.8 billion MDE contracts in 2016, pending any further appeals, the companies with current VBA contracts are (LHI); Veterans Evaluation Services (VES); QTC (QTC in turn contracted with to manage their network of providers); Medical Support Los Angeles, A Medical Corporation (MSLA); and VetFed. The Review Evaluation for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder can be completed by VA or non-VA psychologists and psychiatrists. Clinical or counseling psychology interns, psychiatric residents, licensed clinical social workers, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and clinical nurse specialists may also conduct review PTSD exams, although they must be "closely supervised" by a psychologist or psychiatrist.
Concerns about the reliability and validity of PTSD C&P examinations Researchers, current and former VA psychologists, investigative journalists, and individual veterans have expressed concerns about the and of C&P exams for PTSD because: • Some VA medical centers do not allocate enough time for C&P psychologists and psychiatrists to conduct a thorough, , with less time presumably reducing the validity of the results.
• The time allocated to conduct the exam varies from one to four hours, which in itself indicates a lack of consistency and likely lower rates of . • Research has demonstrated marked regional variance with regard to the proportion of veteran claimants who receive VA disability compensation for PTSD. • One survey of C&P psychologists revealed that only 15% followed VA's own guidance regarding best practices for PTSD compensation and pension exams.
For example, one of the best practice recommendations is to assess veterans for PTSD using the (CAPS), particularly given empirical evidence that using the CAPS improves PTSD C&P exam reliability and validity, but the vast majority of C&P psychologists do not use this validated instrument according to the survey.
• Four possible outcomes of a psychological evaluation, including false positive and false negative conclusions. • An empirical study published in 2017 suggested C&P examiner racial bias might have led to an increased rate of false negative conclusions (regarding PTSD diagnosis and service connection) for Black veterans, and a high rate of conclusions for White veterans. This finding corresponds with past research and legal scholarship discussing the potential for on the part of mental health clinicians in general, and C&P psychologists and psychiatrists in particular.
• Some VA facilities prohibit examiners from using symptom validity tests to screen or assess for malingering and other forms of dissimulation. • Several researchers have published empirical studies in peer-reviewed scholarly journals pointing to significant rates of both PTSD C&P exam conclusions. • Social scientists conducted independent PTSD assessments of veterans who had filed disability benefits claims for PTSD, some of whom had been awarded service-connected compensation for PTSD and some had not.
The study found significant rates of both false positive and false negative VBA adjudicative decisions. Although VBA adjudicators rely on other sources of evidence, in addition to C&P exam results, VBA almost always requests a C&P exam for PTSD claims, and C&P exam results significantly influence VBA determinations. • Investigative journalists' reports, newspaper editorials, and individual combat veterans, assert that a sizable percentage of veterans filing PTSD disability claims exaggerate or feign PTSD symptoms.
Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ) Mental health professionals document the results of Initial and Review PTSD C&P exams on a Disability Benefits Questionnaire (DBQ). The VA developed Disability Benefit Questionnaires (DBQs) to streamline the VBA ratings process and thereby complete the claims process faster. In addition, veterans may ask their treating clinicians to complete a DBQ and possibly bypass the need for a C&P exam. However, it is important to note that the VA discourages their mental health clinicians from completing DBQs for their patients, and similar recommendations have been offered to private psychologists and psychiatrists whose patients ask them to complete DBQs, because it potentially creates a conflict of interest due to a dual role relationship (serving simultaneously as a treating clinician and a forensic evaluator).
C&P psychologists have expressed concern that the DBQ "Symptom List" (Section II, Number 5 on the Initial PTSD DBQ; Section VII on the Review PTSD DBQ; and Section III on the Mental Disorders DBQ ) contains a series of signs, symptoms, and descriptions of functional impairment without any guidance regarding when these items should be endorsed. These C&P examiners argue that such guidance is important because otherwise C&P examiners will (necessarily) use their own idiosyncratic judgments regarding when to endorse each item in the "Symptom List".
In addition, the disability rating may be based largely on which "Symptom List" items are endorsed, since these items are drawn verbatim from the examples given for each level of impairment in the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders. Discharge status In order to be eligible for VA benefits, a veteran must have been discharged under other than dishonorable conditions. Stated differently, if a veteran received a Bad Conduct discharge or a Dishonorable discharge they will, under most circumstances, not be eligible for VA benefits.
In line of duty and exceptions There are exceptions to the general rule that injuries or diseases incurred in, or aggravated by, military service are eligible for VA disability compensation benefits. For example, such injuries or diseases must meet the in line of duty criteria. " In line of duty means an injury or disease incurred or aggravated during a period of active military, naval, or air service unless such injury or disease was the result of the veteran's own willful misconduct or ...
was a result of his or her abuse of alcohol or drugs." Traumatic stressor Matthew J. Friedman of the National Center for PTSD notes that: PTSD is unique among psychiatric diagnoses because of the great importance placed upon the etiological agent, the traumatic stressor.
In fact, one cannot make a PTSD diagnosis unless the patient has actually met the "stressor criterion," which means that he or she has been exposed to an historical event that is considered traumatic. DSM-5 A traumatic stressor is an event that meets Criterion A of the diagnostic criteria for PTSD. The definition of PTSD Criterion A in DSM-5 is: The person was exposed to: death, threatened death, actual or threatened serious injury, or actual or threatened sexual violence, as follows: (one required) 1.
Direct exposure. 2. Witnessing, in person. 3. Indirectly, by learning that a close relative or close friend was exposed to trauma. If the event involved actual or threatened death, it must have been violent or accidental.
4. Repeated or extreme indirect exposure to aversive details of the event(s), usually in the course of professional duties (e.g., first responders, collecting body parts; professionals repeatedly exposed to details of child abuse).
This does not include indirect non-professional exposure through electronic media, television, movies, or pictures. Relevant regulations, were updated on August 4, 2014 to reflect the publication of . Thus, as of August 4, 2014, C&P examiners began using DSM-5 when diagnosing veterans' mental disorders. Service-connection The term, service-connected, means that a veteran has a disease or injury that is "connected" to his or her military service, i.e., the disease or injury was incurred in, or aggravated by, his or her military service.
The official definition in the Code of Federal Regulations begins: Service connection connotes many factors but basically it means that the facts, shown by evidence, establish that a particular injury or disease resulting in disability was incurred coincident with service in the Armed Forces, or if preexisting such service, was aggravated therein.
The relationship between service connection and access to VA healthcare is emphasized in this definition: 'Service connected' veterans are those with documented, compensative conditions related to or aggravated by military service, and they receive priority for enrollment into the Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system.
Types of military service United States Coast Guard Academy seal The regulations describe three categories of military service, active duty, active duty for training, and inactive duty training. Eligibility for VA disability compensation requires that the veteran's service occurred during one of these three categories.
The definition of active duty military service includes "service at any time as a cadet at the , , or Academy, or as a midshipman at the ." • The CNA report cited herein describes the parity ratio as: "A ratio of exactly 1 would be perfect parity, indicating that the earnings of disabled veterans, plus their VA compensation, gives them the same lifetime earnings as their peers. A ratio of less than one would mean that the service-disabled veterans receive less than their peers on average, while a ratio of greater than one would mean that they receive more than their peers." • Note that the term forensic in this context simply means legally-related and does not necessarily have anything to do with criminal law or law enforcement.
The veterans disability benefits claims process for PTSD is ultimately a legal proceeding, which is why PTSD C&P examinations are categorized as psycholegal, medicolegal (an even more precise term is ), or, most commonly, forensic mental health evaluations.
• Not to be confused with staff whose job title is Veterans Service Representative (VSR). • The adverb 'theoretically' is used here because the Rating Formula is based on symptoms, not occupational impairment. While the symptoms associated with the 100% rating for mental disorders often cause significant occupational impairment, e.g., "persistent delusions or hallucinations" or "persistent danger of hurting self or others", they do not necessarily render a veteran unable to work.
• The most recently decided cases are QTC Medical Services., Inc. v. United States, (Fed. Cl. 12 July 2017), and Veterans Evaluation Services, Inc.
v. United States, (Fed. Cl. 12 July 2017). • The Initial PTSD DBQ is available on the VA intranet only. • Note that the outline enumeration for the various parts of the DBQs, e.g., "Sections", in Roman numerals, or "Numbers", in Arabic numerals, differ from one DBQ to another, i.e., they are not uniform.
• See also (for a legal perspective): Ridgway, J. D. (2012). Mind reading and the art of drafting medical opinions in veterans benefits claims.
Psychological Injury and Law, 5(1), 72–87. : • For example, the "Symptom List" contains the following items: flattened affect; circumstantial, circumlocutory, or stereotyped speech; panic attacks more than once a week; difficulty in understanding complex commands; impairment of short- and long-term memory (e.g., retention of only highly learned material, forgetting to complete tasks); impaired judgment; impaired abstract thinking; disturbances of motivation and mood; and difficulty in establishing and maintaining effective work and social relationships.
Each of those signs, symptoms, or descriptions of functional impairment are the exact examples given for the 50% level of impairment in the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders (38 C.F.R.
§ 4.130). Accordingly, if the C&P examiner endorses one or more of these items, the veteran will likely be assigned a 50% disability rating, all other factors being equal, particularly given the advent of VBA's automated Evaluation Builder software. • There is an exception--although 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f) ("Posttraumatic stress disorder") refers to 38 C.F.R. 4.125(a) ("Service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder requires medical evidence diagnosing the condition in accordance with §4.125(a) of this chapter ..."), which specifies use of DSM-5, 38 C.F.R.
§ 3.304(f)(3) was not changed to correspond with DSM-5 PTSD diagnostic criteria. Specifically, the definition of "fear of hostile military or terrorist activity" contains, almost verbatim, language from DSM-IV PTSD diagnostic criterion A: "For purposes of this paragraph, 'fear of hostile military or terrorist activity' means that a veteran experienced, witnessed, or was confronted with an event or circumstance that involved actual or threatened death or serious injury, or a threat to the physical integrity of the veteran or others, [DSM-IV criterion A1] ...
and the veteran's response to the event or circumstance involved a psychological or psycho-physiological state of fear, helplessness, or horror." [DSM-IV criterion A2]). The VA's does not explain why 38 C.F.R. § 3.304(f)(3) still uses DSM-IV diagnostic criteria. • Claims that were appealed before August 4, 2014 would still use DSM-IV PTSD diagnostic criteria.
See at 45094 ("The Secretary does not intend for the provisions of this interim final rule to apply to claims that have been certified for appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals or are pending before the Board of Veterans' Appeals, the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, or the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.") • . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 24 June 2018. • . Department of Veterans Affairs .
Retrieved 24 November 2018. • . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 20 October 2012. • . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 20 October 2012. • . VA.gov . Retrieved 25 November 2018. • . VA.gov . Retrieved 25 November 2018. • . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 25 November 2018. • . Veterans Benefits Administration. Archived from on 26 November 2012 . Retrieved 30 November 2012. • Ridgway, J. (2011). "The splendid isolation revisited: Lessons from the history of veterans benefits before judicial review".
Veterans Law Review. 3: 135–219. . • Economic Systems Inc (2004). VA disability compensation program: Legislative history. Washington, DC: VA Office of Policy, Planning and, Preparedness. • An Act To amend and modify the War Risk Insurance Act, ch. 16, 41 Stat. 371, 373 (1919) ("A schedule of ratings of reductions in earning capacity from specific injuries or combinations of injuries of a permanent nature shall be adopted and applied by the bureau.
Ratings may be as high as 100 per annum. The ratings shall be based, as far as practicable, upon the average impairments of earning capacity resulting from such injuries in civil occupations and not upon the impairment in earning capacity in each individual case ..."). • ^ . Veterans Benefits Administration – Compensation. Department of Veterans Affairs. Note: This web page explains the IU eligibility requirements . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • ^ (PDF). The CNA Corporation. August 2007. p. 4 .
Retrieved 23 August 2014. • Murdoch, Maureen (1 October 2011). . Archives of General Psychiatry. 68 (10): 1072–80. :. . Retrieved 13 August 2014. Regardless of claim outcome, veterans who apply for PTSD disability benefits are highly impaired. However, receiving PTSD benefits was associated with clinically meaningful reductions in PTSD symptoms and less poverty and homelessness. • Scott (USA, Ret.), LTG James Terry (10 October 2007). . Testimony before the Committee on Veterans' Affairs, U.S.
House of Representatives: U.S. Government Printing Office . Retrieved 20 June 2015. We believe that the level of compensation should be based on the severity of the disability and should make up for the average impairments of earnings capacity and the impact of the disability on functionality and quality of life. ...
Current compensation payments do not provide a payment above that required to offset earnings loss. Therefore, there is no current compensation for the impact of disability on the quality of life for most veterans. While permanent quality of life measures are developed, studied, and implemented, we recommend that compensation payments be increased up to 25 percent with priority to the more seriously disabled.
• Office, U. S. Government Accountability (10 September 2012). (GAO-12–846). U.S. Government Accountability Office . Retrieved 20 June 2015. Three key approaches for modernizing VA's disability programs recommended by disability commissions and others—providing quality of life payments, providing integrated vocational services with transitional cash assistance, and systematically factoring the effects of assistive technology and medical interventions into rating decisions—hold opportunity and challenges.
Experts and veteran groups GAO interviewed believe each approach holds at least some opportunity for serving veterans more fairly, equitably, and effectively. • Mossman, D. (1994). . The Public Interest. 114: 35–47 . Retrieved 13 August 2014. Sadly, a program with good intentions has yielded a series of perverse incentives that reward illness, encourage patients to view themselves as incapacitated, and poison the relationships between patients and their caregivers.
• Frueh, B. C.; Grubaugh, A. L.; Elhai, J. D.; Buckley, T. C. (December 2007). . American Journal of Public Health. 97 (12): 2143–45. :. . . Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) psychiatric disability compensation and rehabilitation policies for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), although well intentioned, are more than 60 years old and are seriously flawed. • Satel, S. (February 2011). . American Enterprise Institute .
Retrieved 13 August 2014. Told he is disabled, the veteran and his family may assume—often incorrectly—that he is no longer able to work. At home on disability, he risks adopting a "sick role" that ends up depriving him of the estimable therapeutic value of work. Lost are the sense of purpose work gives (or at least the distraction from depressive rumination it provides), the daily structure it affords, and the opportunity for socializing and cultivating friendships.
The longer he is unemployed, the more his confidence in his ability and motivation to work erodes and his skills atrophy. Once a patient is caught in such a downward spiral of invalidism, it can be hard to throttle back out. What's more, compensation contingent upon being sick often creates a perverse incentive to remain sick.
For example, even if a veteran wants very much to work, he understandably fears losing his financial safety net if he leaves the disability rolls to take a job that ends up proving too much for him. This is how full disability status can undermine the possibility of recovery. • Marx, Brian P.; Miller, Mark W.; Sloan, Denise M.; Litz, Brett T.; Kaloupek, Danny G.; Keane, Terence M. (May 2008). . American Journal of Public Health. 98 (5): 773–74.
:. . . Frueh et al. present an incomplete picture of the literature and neglect substantial evidence that contradicts their thesis • Gade, Daniel. (PDF). National Affairs. 16 (Summer, 2013): 53–69 . Retrieved 13 August 2014. ... VA benefit policies ... distort incentives and encourage veterans to live off of government support instead of working to their full capability.
Adding to the problem is a culture of low expectations, fostered by the misguided understanding of 'disability' upon which both federal policy and private philanthropy are often based.
The result is that, for many veterans, a state of dependency that should be temporary instead becomes permanent. • Phillips, Dave (7 January 2015). . New York Times . Retrieved 20 June 2015. • . Institute of Medicine.
National Academies Press . Retrieved 20 October 2012. • Worthen, Mark; Moering, Robert (December 2011). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 4 (3–4): 187–216. : . Retrieved 19 May 2013. • . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 21 September 2013.
• . MyCareer@VA. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 21 September 2013. • (PDF). Public Law 106-475. Nov. 9, 2000. Government Printing Office. • The VA Medical Examination And Disability Rating Process: Hearing before the Subcomm.
Disability Assistance & Memorial Aff. of the H. Comm. Veterans Aff., 110th Congress 63-65 (2008) (, Senior Program Officer & Study Dir., Comm. Med. Evaluation Veterans Disability Benefits, Bd. Mil. & Veterans Health, Inst. of Med., Nat'l Acad.) ("Applicants for disability compensation are asked to provide their medical records and, under the duty-to-assist law, VBA helps them obtain those records, especially their service medical records.
In nearly every case, VBA has applicants undergo a compensation and pension, or C&P, examination performed by a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or contractor clinician.") • ^ Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) (December 2016). (PDF). www.VA.gov . Retrieved 11 October 2017. The VA claim exam, also called a C&P exam, is different from a regular medical appointment because the examiner won't prescribe any medicine or treat you for your disability. This exam occurs only if you file a compensation or pension claim.
• ^ . MyCareer@VA. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 21 September 2013. • (DOC). 38 C.F.R. §4.130. Department of Veterans Affairs.
Note: The General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders appears immediately under 9440 Chronic adjustment disorder on the third page.
This placement is misleading because it appears as if the Rating Formula applies to Chronic Adjustment Disorder only, which is not the case. The Rating Formula applies to all mental disorders . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • . U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 30 April 2013.
There are numerous ways to apply for VA disability benefits depending on the type of benefit you are seeking ... • . National Association of County Veterans Service Officers . Retrieved 30 April 2013. The National Association of County Veterans Service Officers is an organization made up of local government employees. • . U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs .
Retrieved 2017-12-18. • . • asknod (2012). Veterans Administration Claims: What You Need to Know to Be Successful. . • . VAWatchdog dot org. VA Watchdog (Jim Strickland) .
Retrieved 28 April 2014. • ^ . Code of Federal Regulations. United States Government Printing Office (GPO) . Retrieved 30 April 2013. • . Veterans Benefits Administration. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • . Code of Federal Regulations, Title 38: Pensions, Bonuses, and Veterans' Relief, Part 4 – Schedule for Rating Disabilities, Subpart B – Disability Ratings, Mental Disorders.
Government Printing Office, Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (e-CFR). Note: Scroll down about one page to find the General Rating Formula for Mental Disorders – it appears immediately under 9440 Chronic adjustment disorder.
This placement is misleading because it appears as if the Rating Formula applies to Chronic Adjustment Disorder only, which is not the case. The Rating Formula applies to all mental disorders . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • Simonson, Scott (2008). (PDF). Arizona Law Review.
50: 1177–1204 . Retrieved 10 June 2014. • Wilson, John. . archives.democrats.veterans.house.gov. U.S. House of Representatives .
Retrieved 10 June 2014. • Huang, Daniel (11 May 2015). (12 May 2015 [print edition]). Wall Street Journal. p. A6 . Retrieved 13 May 2015. An effort by the Department of Veterans Affairs that aimed to speed the processing of disability-benefits applications also loosened controls that prevent veterans from exaggerating symptoms to receive more money, say current and former VA employees. A software system introduced in 2012 that automates veterans' disability levels for compensation relies almost solely on a patient's self-reported ailments, the employees say, even in the face of contradictory information.
While the new system reduced paperwork and increased output, it limited the information that the VA's employees who determine compensation eligibility and dollar amounts—called raters—can consider, according to these employees. The result, raters contend: a more inaccurate process that approves higher levels of disability than veterans' military records, medical histories and other evidence might show—in some cases increasing payments to veterans by thousands of dollars a month.
The process, they maintain, also ignores stated VA rules in which claims must be evaluated 'in light of the [veteran's] whole recorded history.' Senior VA officials counter that the software system still relies on raters' expertise to determine the accuracy of claims. They say it is designed to facilitate, but not replace, that process. Raters 'have every right to change [the symptoms] if there is other evidence in the file,' one official said.
• Office, U. S. Government Accountability (10 September 2012). (GAO-12–846). United States Government Accountability Office . Retrieved 5 August 2014. • . Veterans Benefits Administration. Department of Veterans Affairs. Note: Scroll down the web page for the New Claims section . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • . Veterans Benefits Administration, M21-1MR Compensation and Pension Manual Rewrite (DOC).
Department of Veterans Affairs. Note: gainful employment is defined at the bottom of page 2-F-2 . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • (PDF). Veterans Benefits Administration – Compensation (DOC). Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 28 December 2013. • (PDF). 3.1. Washington, DC: Department of Veterans Affairs. 2016. pp. 238–240. The Office of Disability and Medical Assessment (DMA) (10NC8) provides executive leadership to VHA's disability programs worldwide, including both the traditional Compensation and Pension (C&P) and the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (IDES) programs.
• (PDF). VHA Publications. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration. 22 April 2013 . Retrieved 23 August 2014. • Murphy, Thomas (25 June 2014).
. VBA and VHA Interactions: Ordering and Conducting Medical Examinations: U.S. House of Representatives, Committee on Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 23 August 2014. VHA supplements these C&P clinics' capabilities, as necessary, using contracted disability examination services. These contractors support the performance of required disability examinations during surges in claims processing, for periods of staffing vacancies, or for times when specialists are required.
VHA may also use these services for Veterans who do not live near a VHA medical facility. The use of these "on demand" services allows VHA to maintain examination timeliness and quality to support VA's goals for processing disability claims. VHA medical facilities can use locally contracted services through an individual facility or utilize the centralized, national VHA Disability Examination Management (DEM) contract. ...
In addition to examinations completed by VHA, VBA contracts with three vendors to conduct C&P examinations. • Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Public and Intergovernmental Affairs (19 September 2016). . www.va.gov . Retrieved October 12, 2017. • Advisory Committee on Disability Compensation, Department of Veterans Affairs, June 20–21 Meeting Minutes (p.
4) (2017). • . logisticshealth.com . Retrieved 2018-01-04. • . Retrieved 23 August 2014. • . QTCM.com. QTC, A Lockheed-Martin Company . Retrieved 23 August 2014. • . www.magellanprovider.com . Retrieved 2018-01-04. QTC has chosen Magellan to maintain a network of providers offering Compensation and Pension (C&P) examinations to veterans and service members.
• . MSLACA.com. MSLA, A Medical Corporation . Retrieved 23 August 2014. • . www.vetfed.com . Retrieved October 12, 2017. • (PDF). Veterans Health Administration. October 2012 .
Retrieved 24 August 2014. The following health care providers can perform REVIEW examinations for PTSD: a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist; a licensed doctorate-level psychologist; a doctorate-level mental health provider under the close supervision of a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist or licensed doctorate-level psychologist; a psychiatry resident under close supervision of a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist or licensed doctorate-level psychologist; a clinical or counseling psychologist completing a one-year internship or residency (for purposes of a doctorate-level degree) under close supervision of a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist or licensed doctorate-level psychologist; or a licensed clinical social worker (LCSW), a nurse practitioner, a clinical nurse specialist, or a physician assistant, under close supervision of a board-certified or board-eligible psychiatrist or licensed doctorate-level psychologist.
• Institute of Medicine and National Research Council (8 May 2007). . National Academies Press. pp. 204–05 . Retrieved 16 November 2014. • ^ Russo, Arthur (5 Mar 2014). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 7 (2): 178–90. : . Retrieved 16 November 2014. • Worthen, M. D.; Moering, R. G. (December 2011). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 4 (3–4): 187–216. : . Retrieved 16 November 2014. • Sparr, L. F.; White, R.; Friedman, M.
J.; Wiles, D. B. (1994). "Veterans' psychiatric benefits: enter courts and attorneys". The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. 22 (2): 205–222. . . Among regional offices, there has been considerable variability in adjudicating claims. For example from 1986 to 1990, the PTSD claim approval rate in 58 VA regional offices varied from 36.2 percent to 73.5 percent.
• Murdoch, Maureen; Hodges, James; Cowper, Diane; Sayer, Nina (February 2005). "Regional variation and other correlates of Department of Veterans Affairs Disability Awards for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder". Medical Care. 43 (2): 112–121. :. . . ... rates of PTSD service connection varied almost twofold across regions between 1994 and 1998.
Consistent with earlier research, this variation could not be explained by regional dissimilarities in veterans' sociodemographic or military characteristics, rates of major medical comorbidity, or combat-injury status. We extend these findings to show that the regional variation in PTSD disability awards likewise could not be attributed to regional differences in veterans' current PTSD symptom severity or level of disability.
• Watson, P.; McFall, M.; McBrine, C.; Schnurr, P. P.; Friedman, M. J.; Keane, T.; Hamblen, J. L. (2002). (PDF). Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 13 May 2015. This document provides information on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and current recommendations regarding what is known about "best practice" procedures for assessing PTSD among veteran populations. • Jackson, J. C.; et al. (October 2011). "Variation in practices and attitudes of clinicians assessing PTSD-related disability among veterans".
Journal of Traumatic Stress. 24 (5): 609–13. :. . • . PTSD: For Professionals. National Center for PTSD . Retrieved 16 November 2014. The CAPS is the gold standard in PTSD assessment. • Speroff, T.; et al. (December 2012). "Impact of evidence-based standardized assessment on the disability clinical interview for diagnosis of service-connected PTSD: A cluster-randomized trial".
Journal of Traumatic Stress. 25 (6): 607–15. :. . The findings of this study show that administering a standardized disability assessment resulted in more complete coverage of functional impairment and PTSD symptoms. Standardized assessment elicited an increase in relevant information and nearly eliminated variation between examiners and medical centers.
Furthermore, this study found that standardized assessment substantially diminished the uncertainty in diagnosis, and increased concordance of diagnosis ...
• O'Toole, Marie T., ed. (2013). Mosby's Medical Dictionary (Kindle edition) (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Locations 77966-77971. . false negative - an incorrect result of a diagnostic test or procedure that falsely indicates the absence of a finding, condition, or disease. The rate of occurrence of false-negative results varies with the diagnostic accuracy and specificity of the test or procedure.
As the accuracy and specificity of a test increase, the rate of false-negatives decreases. Certain tests are known to yield false negative results at a certain rate; in all tests a small number will occur by chance alone. • Colman, Andrew M. (2015). . A Dictionary of Psychology (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. :. . false positive, n. - An incorrect classification of an element as a member of a class to which it does not in fact belong, as when a decision procedure results in a person being wrongly diagnosed as having a disorder.
• Marx, Brian P.; Engel-Rebitzer, Eden; Bovin, Michelle J.; Parker-Guilbert, Kelly S.; Moshier, Samantha; Barretto, Kenneth; Szafranski, Derek; Gallagher, Matthew W.; Holowka, Darren W. (2017). "The influence of veteran race and psychometric testing on veterans affairs posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) disability exam outcomes". Psychological Assessment. 29 (6): 710–719. :. . ... among veterans diagnosed with PTSD by an independent evaluator, Black veterans were significantly less likely than White veterans to receive both a C&P PTSD diagnosis and to be given PTSD service connection status.
Further, among veterans not meeting diagnostic criteria for SCID PTSD, Black veterans tended to be more likely than White veterans to be denied both C&P PTSD status and PTSD service connection status. • Murdoch, Maureen; Hodges, James; Cowper, Diane; Fortier, Larry; van Ryn, Michelle (April 2003).
"Racial disparities in VA service connection for posttraumatic stress disorder disability". Medical Care. 41 (4): 536–549. :. . . After adjusting for respondents' sociodemographic characteristics, symptom severity, functional status, and trauma histories, black persons' rate of service connection for PTSD was 43% compared with 56% for other respondents (P = 0.003).
• Rosen, Marc I.; Afshartous, David; Nwosu, Sam; Scott, Melanie C.; Jackson, James C.; Marx, Brian; Murdoch, Maureen; Sinnot, Patrica L.; Speroff, Theodore (2013-04-01). . Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.). 64 (4): 354–359. :. . . . • Wandler, Hillary A. (Spring 2013). . Mental Health Law & Policy Journal. 2: 18. The real potential for injustice comes when patient's whose culture's heavily influence the way they communicate distress meet clinicians who use a universalist or one-size-fits-all approach to assessment and diagnosis.
As a patient may report symptoms differently across cultures, a clinician may interpret what the patient reports differently depending on the clinician's approach to assessment and diagnosis. The effect is even more significant when the patient and the clinician are from different cultures. • Poyner, G. (27 May 2010). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 3 (2): 130–32. : . Retrieved 16 November 2014. • McMath, William (April 11, 2015).
. My Education at the VA: C&P Exams and PTSD . Retrieved December 20, 2017. ... the psychology supervisor at my facility refused to order psychological tests with titles containing the word 'malingering,' and patients who were obviously lying or faking were excused by the mantra 'veterans--even when they have PTSD--feel like they have to exaggerate just to be believed.' • Arbisi, P.
A.; Murdoch, M.; Fortier, L.; McNulty, J. (2004). "MMPI-2 validity and award of service connection for PTSD during the VA compensation and pension evaluation". Psychological Services. 1 (1): 56–67. :. • Freeman, T.; Powell, M.; Kimbrell, T. (15 April 2008). . Psychiatry Research. 158 (3): 374–80. :. . Retrieved 19 November 2014. • Frueh, B. C.; Hamner, M. B.; Cahill, S. P.; Gold, P. B.; Hamlin, K. L. (October 2000). . Clinical Psychology Review. 20 (7): 853–85.
:. . Retrieved 19 November 2014. • Hall, R. C. W.; Hall, R. C. W. (December 2006). . General Hospital Psychiatry. 28 (6): 525–35. :. . Retrieved 19 November 2014. • Gold, P. B.; Frueh, B. C. (November 1999). "Compensation-seeking and extreme exaggeration of psychopathology among combat veterans evaluated for posttraumatic stress disorder". The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 187 (11): 680–84. :. . • Wisdom, N. M.; et al. (2014).
"PTSD and cognitive functioning: Importance of including performance validity testing". The Clinical Neuropsychologist. 28 (1): 128–45. :. . • Marx, Brian P.; Bovin, Michelle J.; Szafranski, Derek D.; Engel-Rebitzer, Eden; Gallagher, Matthew W.; Holowka, Darren W.; Schnurr, Paula P.; Rosen, Raymond C.; Keane, Terence M.
(2016-01-19). . The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 77 (4): 517–522. :. . . This study examined the extent to which veterans' posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) service connection (SC) status corresponded to their PTSD diagnostic status, as determined by a semistructured diagnostic interview. ... For current PTSD, results showed a slightly higher proportion of false positives—individuals who did not meet criteria but who did have SC for PTSD—than false negatives—individuals who met SCID criteria but did not have SC for PTSD.
For lifetime PTSD, the proportion of false negatives was approximately twice the proportion of false positives. ... PTSD diagnostic and SC status are discordant for a significant minority of veterans. • The VA Medical Examination And Disability Rating Process: Hearing before the Subcomm.
Disability Assistance & Memorial Aff. of the H. Comm. Veterans Aff., 110th Congress 63-65 (2008) (statement of Michael McGeary, Senior Program Officer & Study Dir., Comm. Med. Evaluation Veterans Disability Benefits, Bd. Mil. & Veterans Health, Inst.
of Med., Nat'l Acad.)(GPO ) ("Applicants for disability compensation are asked to provide their medical records and, under the duty-to-assist law, VBA helps them obtain those records, especially their service medical records.
In nearly every case, VBA has applicants undergo a compensation and pension, or C&P, examination performed by a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or contractor clinician.") • U.S.
Dep't Veterans Aff., Off. Inspector Gen., Review of Compensation and Pension Medical Examination Services, Rep.
No. 7R1-A02-114 (1997) ("Disability benefit payments are based, in part, on interpretations of medical evidence by the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) disability rating specialists. That evidence is developed by physicians employed or supervised by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA), in the form of compensation and pension (C&P) examinations. ... VBA cannot complete payment action on veterans' disability claims until examination results are received.") • Washington v.
Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 191, 197 (2007) (Hagel, J., concurring) ("Because of the immense importance of medical evidence in the VA claims process," [medical examinations and opinions] "can bear significantly upon the outcome of the claim for VA benefits.") • , 1353, (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Reyna, J., dissenting from denial of rehearing en banc) ("VA regional offices use the opinions prepared by examiners in determining whether to award a veteran disability benefits.
The decision whether to award benefits often turns on whether the disability is shown to be connected to the veteran's military service. ... In other words, as in this case, the service connection issue is often dispositive.") • U.S.
Government Accountability Office, Military sexual trauma: Improvements made, but VA can do more to track and improve the consistency of disability claim decisions (p. 18) (2014) () ("VBA adjudicators generally rely on examiners' assessments when deciding whether to approve a claim ...").
• Zarembo, Alan (3 August 2014). . Los Angeles Times . Retrieved 19 November 2014. Even some veterans whose diagnosis falls under deep suspicion have managed to keep their disability ratings. In one case that Moering reviewed in 2009, he searched military records and concluded that a Navy veteran on the disability rolls for PTSD had lied to VA clinicians about having served in the elite SEALs and concocted his combat history.
The VA responded by reducing his PTSD rating from 50% to 30%, records show. • Huang, Daniel (27 October 2014). . The Wall Street Journal. Dow Jones & Company . Retrieved 19 November 2014. Requests for disability pay by veterans have ballooned during the past five years, overloading many doctors who evaluate the claims and increasing the possibility of fraud, according to current and former VA staff and government watchdogs.
• McVay, Mark (21 June 2014). . Denver Post . Retrieved 20 June 2015. I ran into John a few years back for the first time since the early 1970s when we both returned to Michigan from Vietnam. But John was clearly excited to see me. 'Hey man,' he said, 'have you applied for PTSD benefits yet? You can get a couple thousand a month. All you have to do is go to this counseling program for two weeks. Nothing to it. You ought to go.' • Harbaugh, Ken (1 June 2015).
. New York Times . Retrieved 20 June 2015. And while most vets who receive disability checks deserve them, one of the worst kept secrets among those seeking a disability rating is that the system can be beaten. Claim the right combination of symptoms, whether you are suffering or not, and there is a decent chance you can get a monthly disability check, tax free, for the rest of your life.
There are even blogs out there to walk you through the process of claiming an injury that cannot be disproved. • Lilyea, Jonn (20 August 2016). . This ain't Hell, but you can see it from here. (In particular, see comments to the blog post by Hondo, RGR 4-78, Air Cav, and HMC Ret.) . Retrieved 13 October 2017. • Lilyea, Jonn (4 May 2017). . This ain't Hell, but you can see it from here. (In particular, see the comment by River Rat RVN.) . Retrieved 13 October 2017. • Hernandez, Christopher (10 February 2014).
. Breach Bang Clear . Retrieved 13 October 2017. I think all of us combat veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan know of someone faking PTSD for free money. ... As with any form of welfare, people are going to jump on it if it's easy money.
If we make it so simple to get diagnosed as "disabled" by PTSD, we shouldn't be surprised that so many people get diagnosed. • Hernandez, Christopher (26 February 2014). . Breach Bang Clear . Retrieved 13 October 2017. I'm proud as hell of being a veteran. I'm proud of the men and women I served with.
¶ I didn't join the military so that my country could give me a free ride for the rest of my life, I joined to defend it from its worst enemies.
I expected pain, fear and hardship from war. I believe our job as soldiers is to endure that pain, fear and hardship so our citizens don't have to. We are the barrier between our people and foreign threats. ¶ Being part of that barrier doesn't require heroism.
But it does require integrity, courage and strength. The same integrity, courage and strength my great uncle Leo undoubtedly showed before he marched to his death on Bataan, and my great uncle Jesse showed when he jumped into Sicily, Normandy and Holland, and my great uncle Richard showed as he fought his way through Korea.
And by generations of other American warriors on battlegrounds from Lexington to the Korengal Valley. ¶ Every time a veteran makes a false claim of PTSD, that barrier is weakened. Every time a veteran is exposed as a fraud, the barrier loses precious integrity. Every story that hints we're all damaged by PTSD, that we're all unstable, that we're all victims, gouges chunks from the barrier's foundation. • Hernandez, Christopher (21 February 2016).
. Breach Bang Clear . Retrieved 13 October 2017. John [the VA-employed C&P psychologist] can't give specifics, but two Army veterans who served during a particular war told stories of being traumatized by their experiences at a notorious attack. However, the attack they claimed to have witnessed happened years after their war and discharge, and involved a different service.
'I told one of those veterans he couldn't have been there, because his DD-214 showed he wasn't even in the military when it happened. He stopped talking, glared at me, grabbed his DD-214 and walked out.' ¶ So he was kicked out of the VA for malingering, right?
Of course not. 'In my notes I wrote that the veteran was clearly malingering, and could not have been at his claimed qualifying event,' John said. 'But the evaluator either didn't bother to read my notes, or wanted to be nice to the veteran.
So he's on 100% disability for PTSD, even after I caught him making up trauma.' • Overcoming PTSD: Assessing VA's Efforts to Promote Wellness and Healing, H. Comm. Veterans Affairs, 115th Cong.
(2017) () ("[During group psychotherapy sessions] I heard stories that sounded a lot like a bad day rather than a traumatic moment. As weeks went by, I realized the sad truth about a portion of the veterans there, they were scammers, seeking a higher rating without a real trauma. This was proven when I overheard one vet say to another that he had to 'pay the bills' and how he 'was hoping this in-patient was enough for a 100% rating'. I vowed never to participate in group counseling through the VA again.
... The trend I have seen among the combat veterans, the most traumatized group, [is to] stay away from the VA, or at the very least, [stay away from] the group counseling settings. They have no patience for the fraudulent veterans scamming the system to get a pay check and they are definitely not going to open up about their worst days to those who know nothing about them.") • .
Veterans Health Administration . Retrieved 24 August 2014. • (PDF). U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans Affairs. 13 March 2013. p. 12 . Retrieved 24 August 2014. DBQs replace traditional VA examination reports and are designed to capture all the needed medical information relevant to a specific condition at once and up front so that claims can be developed and processed in a more timely and accurate manner, with the end result being faster service for Veterans.
DBQs change the way medical evidence is collected, giving Veterans the option of having their private physician complete a DBQ that provides the medical information needed to rate their claims—minimizing the need for a VA exam which adds additional time to the claim development process.
Information in the DBQs maps to the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities, and provides all of the necessary information to decide a disability claim. • (PDF). 4(e)(1)(c): Veterans Health Administration. January 14, 2013. p. 4 . Retrieved 24 August 2014.
For mental health disability examination requests, it is recommended that the Veteran's treating provider not complete the disability examination to maintain the integrity of the patient-provider relationship. • Worthen, M. D.; Moering, R. G. (December 2011). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 4 (3–4): 193.
:. ... we strongly recommend not completing a DBQ for a veteran the private practitioner is seeing for psychotherapy or psychiatric treatment as it will create the awkward position of a dual role relationship with the patient, viz., psychologist or doctor and independent evaluator ... • Strasburger, L. G.; Gutheil, T. G.; Brodsky, A. (1 April 1997). (PDF). The American Journal of Psychiatry.
154 (4): 448–56. :. . Retrieved 24 August 2014. The process of psychotherapy is a search for meaning more than for facts. In other words, it may be conceived of more as a search for narrative truth (a term now in common use) than for historical truth. Whereas the forensic examiner is skeptical, questioning even plausible assertions for purposes of evaluation, the therapist may be deliberately credulous, provisionally 'believing' even implausible assertions for therapeutic purposes.
The therapist accepts the patient's narrative as representing an inner, personal reality, albeit colored by biases and misperceptions. This narrative is not expected to be a veridical history; rather, the therapist strives to see the world 'through the patient's eyes.' [citation footnote numbers omitted] • Greenberg, S. A.; Shuman, D. W. (1997). (PDF). Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 28 (1): 50–57. . :. The therapist is a care provider and usually supportive, accepting, and empathic; the forensic evaluator is an assessor and usually neutral, objective, and detached as to the forensic issues.
A forensic evaluator's task is to gain an empathic understanding of the person but to remain dispassionate as to the psycholegal issues being evaluated. For therapists, empathy and sympathy–generating a desire to help–usually go hand-in-hand.
For forensic evaluators, the task is a dispassionate assessment of the psycholegal issues. • (PDF). VBA Forms. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 13 May 2015. • (PDF). VBA Forms. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 13 May 2015. • Worthen, M. D.; Moering, R. G. (December 2011). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 4 (3–4): 192. :. One section of every mental health-related DBQ is a symptom checklist where, for example, examiners are asked to check off a box if a veteran has "depressed mood" or "anxiety." Unfortunately, the DBQ does not provide any guidance with regard to how one determines the level of symptom frequency, severity, or duration required to endorse a given symptom.
Thus, for example, if a veteran reports that she feels "a little depressed" once or twice a week, it is not clear if the examiner should check off the "depressed mood" box or not. • Russo, A. C. (March 2013). "Ethical, Legal and Risk Management Considerations in the Neuropsychological Assessment of Veterans".
Psychological Injury and Law. 6 (1): 21–30. :. VHA neuropsychologists performing VBA C&P examinations [should be] aware of the limitations of the DEMO training modules and the Disability Benefit Questionnaires (DBQ) as used for VBA C&P examination report templates. • Huang, Daniel (11 May 2015). . Wall Street Journal.
Dow Jones & Company . Retrieved 24 August 2015. A software system introduced in 2012 that automates veterans' disability levels for compensation relies almost solely on a patient's self-reported ailments, the employees say, even in the face of contradictory information.
While the new system reduced paperwork and increased output, it limited the information that the VA's employees who determine compensation eligibility and dollar amounts—called raters—can consider, according to these employees.
• . Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 30 November 2012. • Moering, Robert (2011). (PDF). Psychological Injury and Law. 4 (3–4): 217–34. :. • (PDF). U.S. Government Printing Office, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) .
Retrieved 30 November 2012. • Friedman, MD, PhD, Matthew J. . National Center for PTSD . Retrieved 30 November 2012. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list () • See e.g., Diagnosis of mental disorders, 38 C.F.R. 4.125(a). • (PDF). U.S. Government Printing Office. 4 August 2014. p. 45094 . Retrieved 21 January 2015. • . Federal Benefits for Veterans, Dependents and Survivors. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs .
Retrieved 6 July 2013. • 38 CFR §3.303(a) • • Murdoch, Maureen; Hodges J; Cowper D; Fortier L; van Ryn M (April 2003). . Medical Care. 41 (4): 536–49. :. . • ^ (PDF). U.S. Government Printing Office, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) .
Retrieved 30 November 2012. • . Veterans Benefits Administration. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs . Retrieved 24 August 2015. Disability compensation is a monthly tax-free benefit paid to Veterans who are at least 10% disabled because of injuries or diseases that were incurred in or aggravated during active duty, active duty for training, or inactive duty training. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs benefits information • • • • • - Updated annually; print (PDF) & online versions.
• - Registration required (available to veterans & family members only). • • - Provided by the . U.S. government resources for military personnel and veterans • • • - Search engine specific to VA services.
• - The NRD is a partnership among the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of Labor, and Department of Veterans Affairs. The NRD.gov website connects wounded warriors, service members, veterans, their families, and caregivers to programs and services that support them. VA treatment resources for veterans with PTSD • - "Learn more about PTSD, treatment options, self-help tools, and resources to help you recover." • • • • •
best dating someone with ptsd military disability compensation - PTSD
For years veterans with post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have had to provide specific documentation to the Veterans Administration (VA) to prove the causes of their condition to receive disability compensation.
This is about to change. that the Department of Veterans Affairs is establishing new rules that will make it easier for veterans to receive disability compensation for an anxiety disorder triggered by traumatic events, which affects hundreds of thousands of veterans. The regulation change applies to veterans of all wars. The VA will grant compensation if the veteran can prove that they served in a war zone at a job consistent with the events that caused their condition or if the veteran had reasons to fear traumatic events not necessarily experienced.
Eric K. Shineski, secretary of veteran affairs said in a statement to the , “This nation has a solemn obligation to the men and women who have honorably served this country and suffer from the emotional and often devastating hidden wounds of war.
This final regulation goes a long way to ensure that veterans receive the benefits and services they need.” One stipulation of the rule requires that final determination on a veteran’s case be made by a psychiatrist or psychologist from the VA for the purpose of assessing whether or not the traumatic events, or stressors, are consistent with the veteran’s military duties.
The regulations for PTSD compensation claims are expected to take effect July 12, 2010. If you need help in applying for disability compensation from the VA for PTSD, to help you develop your case. We know how to improve your chances for approval of compensation and healthcare benefits from the VA.
Note: All representation coordinated by Alpha is provided by our employees, the Advocates, who are accredited by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). No private organization that trains and employs accredited agents has been legally recognized by the VA for the purposes of preparation, presentation, and prosecution of claims.
This work must be done by the Advocates themselves and not organizations. I am confused. My husband is 170% disabled from the war in vietnam. He got his 100letter about 5 years ago. If he dies before he was rated 100% for 10 years what happens. He had a heart attack which the va says is from agent orange and he had that heart attack 10 years ago. But we only filed for disability about 8 years ago and it took about 2 to 3 years for him to receive the 100% rating.
What is the rule please. I find it all very confusing. Seems the VA has pulled my disability case and is attempting to take away my disability benefits. I have been rated 100% perminent and total disabled due to service related injuries. I received a call from a man who is reviewing my case and must meet with me in person to see if i still qualify for 100% pay…Whats this all about???
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder , is perhaps the psychiatric disorder most commonly associated with military conflict. After experiencing a traumatic incident, veterans will sometimes develop feelings of hopelessness, despair and shame. While it is normal to have disturbing memories of such stressful events, most people begin feeling like themselves again after a few weeks.
When the feelings of anxiety and depression do not fade as expected, the person may have PTSD. Symptoms of PTSD Some of the most common symptoms of PTSD include recurring memories or nightmares of the event(s).
Insomnia, emotional outbursts and feelings of isolation are also common among people with PTSD. It is easy for people suffering from the disorder to feel guilty about what they survived and begin avoiding the ones they love most. Some turn to drugs or alcohol to deal with the stress. Sometimes these symptoms take months or even years to show up. They can also come and go. If the symptoms don’t go away or are getting worse and disrupting your daily life, you should be evaluated for PTSD.
Veterans & PTSD It is no secret that many veterans coming back from a combat deployment are often plagued with PTSD symptoms.
By some estimates, one in five vets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan experience symptoms of PTSD or major depression. Given that there are over 2.3 million American veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, PTSD is sadly all too common. Many of these service members don’t seek treatment because they fear it will harm their careers. Untreated, PTSD and depression can lead to cascading problems, such as drug use, marital problems, unemployment and even suicide.
Military Sexual Trauma and PTSD Many people associate PTSD with its prevalence in the military, particularly among veterans of active combat. The reality is that PTSD can stem from all kinds of trauma, including sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape.
When a military serviceman or woman is pressured into sexual activity against their will, PTSD can develop afterward. The VA considers any such experience that occurs while the individual is on active duty to be . MST claims are rated by the VA under PTSD or depression. Filing a PTSD Claim Based on MST Veterans filing PTSD claims are usually required to submit service records as evidence that a stressful, traumatic incident occurred.
Because sexual assault is not documented in the same way, PTSD claims based on MST require slightly different forms of evidence. Veterans may opt to submit proof that MST occurred in the form of: • Police reports • Medical documentation • Counseling records • Records from a rape crisis center • Pregnancy test results • Sexually transmitted disease test results • Statements from family members, roommates, members of the clergy or other service members Behavioral changes can also indicate that an MST has occurred.
Panic attacks, depression, transfer requests and substance abuse problems can qualify as evidence that a stressful incident happened. Unexplained social and economic changes, as well as a deterioration in quality of work can also qualify. Veterans struggling with PTSD do not have to go it alone.
A lawyer knowledgeable about PTSD and MST can be a veteran’s closest ally and best advocate. The Veterans Law Group can help those with PTSD seek the maximum compensation possible for their disability claim. If you or someone you love is struggling with PTSD after a traumatic experience in the service, for compassionate representation. PTSD Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder , is perhaps the psychiatric disorder most commonly associated with military conflict. After experiencing a traumatic incident, veterans will sometimes develop feelings of hopelessness, despair and shame.
While it is normal to have disturbing memories of such stressful events, most people begin feeling like themselves again after a few weeks. When the feelings of anxiety and depression do not fade as expected, the person may have PTSD. Symptoms of PTSD Some of the most common symptoms of PTSD include recurring memories or nightmares of the event(s). Insomnia, emotional outbursts and feelings of isolation are also common among people with PTSD.
It is easy for people suffering from the disorder to feel guilty about what they survived and begin avoiding the ones they love most. Some turn to drugs or alcohol to deal with the stress. Sometimes these symptoms take months or even years to show up. They can also come and go. If the symptoms don’t go away or are getting worse and disrupting your daily life, you should be evaluated for PTSD. Veterans & PTSD It is no secret that many veterans coming back from a combat deployment are often plagued with PTSD symptoms.
By some estimates, one in five vets returning from Iraq and Afghanistan experience symptoms of PTSD or major depression. Given that there are over 2.3 million American veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, PTSD is sadly all too common. Many of these service members don’t seek treatment because they fear it will harm their careers. Untreated, PTSD and depression can lead to cascading problems, such as drug use, marital problems, unemployment and even suicide. Military Sexual Trauma and PTSD Many people associate PTSD with its prevalence in the military, particularly among veterans of active combat.
The reality is that PTSD can stem from all kinds of trauma, including sexual harassment, sexual assault and rape. When a military serviceman or woman is pressured into sexual activity against their will, PTSD can develop afterward. The VA considers any such experience that occurs while the individual is on active duty to be . MST claims are rated by the VA under PTSD or depression. Filing a PTSD Claim Based on MST Veterans filing PTSD claims are usually required to submit service records as evidence that a stressful, traumatic incident occurred.
Because sexual assault is not documented in the same way, PTSD claims based on MST require slightly different forms of evidence. Veterans may opt to submit proof that MST occurred in the form of: • Police reports • Medical documentation • Counseling records • Records from a rape crisis center • Pregnancy test results • Sexually transmitted disease test results • Statements from family members, roommates, members of the clergy or other service members Behavioral changes can also indicate that an MST has occurred.
Panic attacks, depression, transfer requests and substance abuse problems can qualify as evidence that a stressful incident happened. Unexplained social and economic changes, as well as a deterioration in quality of work can also qualify.
Veterans struggling with PTSD do not have to go it alone. A lawyer knowledgeable about PTSD and MST can be a veteran’s closest ally and best advocate. The Veterans Law Group can help those with PTSD seek the maximum compensation possible for their disability claim. If you or someone you love is struggling with PTSD after a traumatic experience in the service, for compassionate representation. "Although it took a while for the result to come out, VLG was able to accomplish my expectations for a 100% rating.
Due to complex medical issues, I appreciate the care you took so I did not have to appear personally in the VA local office or VA court. I am quite satisfied. I feel I am not shortchanged anymore." • Valued Client |Perris, CA $25,039 • "Although it took a while for the result to come out, VLG was able to accomplish my expectations for a 100% rating. Due to complex medical issues, I appreciate the care you took so I did not have to appear personally in the VA local office or VA court.
I am quite satisfied. I feel I am not shortchanged anymore."
VA Back Pay (a.k.a. Retroactive Benefits)